Dreams,
their origins and their interpretation, have been a subject of intense speculation
for people at all levels of society since ancient times. However, unlike the
prevailing views that were held in antiquity, in modern times relatively few of
those people having an active interest in brain activity have thought that
preoccupation with the meaning of dreams is justified, but the purposes and
process of dreaming have intrigued even the sceptics.
Here,
however, as someone who has always taken a keen interest in the subject I do
want to say something about the content of dreams, my understanding of their possible
meaning(s), how these might be accessed and what we may infer from them about
our personal lives, our nature - and also about reality, particularly in
respect of time and communication.
The
first point to clear up is that in my opinion at least, although some interesting
things may be learnt, unless you are neurotic your dreams will not tell you
very much that is absolutely fundamental about yourself that you do not already
know.
Your
dreams may however reflect what you do know about yourself in a variety of ways
and employ a wide variety of images and settings in so doing. And there will be
especially rich dreams that can be seen as having more than one level of
meaning. The connections between these layers can be interesting.
Much
of the classical imagery of dreams was set out by Sigmund Freud, particularly
in his monumental and path-breaking work The
Interpretation of Dreams. Quite a few people today are no doubt still
unhappy about some aspects of Freud’s analysis and the erotic imagery (trains,
tunnels, piers, clock towers, trees etc.) of which he wrote but I think that at
one level it tends to be correct (but why a clock tower rather than a train you
might fruitfully ask).
Some
dream images may have more than one personal association and they may evoke
more than one emotion – for example involving anxiety (as may be instanced by the
possibility of missing a train) as well as more pleasurable sensations. There
is usually some food for thought there I think.
Carl
Jung, once a colleague of Freud, gave less prominence to sexual imagery than
Freud himself and some of what he said added richness to Freud’s perceptions on
dreams. Jung introduced other images too, such as the well known mandalas.
Furthermore,
most people will have their own set of visceral images, but I will not go into
any detail here. I forget whether it was Freud or Jung who pointed out that in
dreams some groups composed of three elements may refer to the male genitalia -
these could be trios of people or animals for instance.
But
in my opinion there is a lot more to the understanding of dreams than this. One
of Freud’s perceptions was that the elements used in the composition of one’s
dreams make use of what he termed ‘the day’s residues’. These are bits and
pieces of our mostly mundane experiences during the preceding day that, as the
modern understanding goes, the brain is likely to be sorting out for longer
term storage or eventual removal. But these residues may be combined and built
on to produce a particular story-like dream.
How
may dreams be interpreted? The first thing to make clear is that an
off-the-shelf guide book approach to images and their supposed significance
simply will not do. There is in fact only one person who can interpret a dream
properly and thoroughly, and that is the dreamer themselves since the dream
uses their residues and personal images, and its meaning relates to their
experiences either recent or from years ago – quite often childhood, puberty or
experiences with a high emotional charge.
Other
parties may gently aid in the dream interpretation, usually by way of a well
placed suggestion or two, and by being generally supportive and encouraging in
the process but, importantly, directly intervening no further than to ask the
occasional question such as: “What were you feeling at this point in the dream?”
or “Have you had this dream before?” If you do this, my advice is not to have
eye contact with the other person – sit at an angle.
One
factor that is very important in interpretation is the feeling tone in dreams.
What emotions accompanied the dream or certain parts of it – excitement,
anxiety, awe or typically a fusion of many feelings? This is the area where the
unravelling is likely to be especially productive. Productive, that is,
primarily in terms of interest rather than dramatic revelations.
Centuries
ago dreams were given great weight when they related to major events that were supposedly
coming down the track from the future. I’m profoundly suspicious about the
verity of such reported historic or religious dreams and suspect that many of
them in fact never occurred but were stories aimed to further self-interest,
promote an agenda, manipulate either the ‘masses’ or Kings (in which case it’s
best to be positive and right!)
I must
say that have no time for seeing dreams (or anything else for that matter) as
‘omens’ with their predominant focus on the negative, on helplessness and thus
the diminishment of the role of free will and the effectiveness of action to
counter possible very real threats such as impending war.
But
I expect many of us have had what appear to be glimpses of future events in our
personal lives. I’ve had a few of these myself but before going overboard one
should realise that there are seven billion potential dreamers every night,
making some two hundred trillion dreams that occur worldwide in a lifetime!
Some of these dreams will surely look like predictions but, as rational
analysis reveals, could also be a product of chance. But maybe not all of them
– and there is another sort of future related dream too.
These
are those dreams where, on waking, you do not sense a reference to the future
or even remember the dream unprompted. But an apparently run of the mill (if
slightly odd in feeling) and maybe forgotten dream may leap back into mind when
an event occurs in the future that was ‘seen’ in the dream. In my case these
always have several characteristics in common – the time period is always the
following day, the matter is always utterly trivial, it always has a ‘visceral’
nature, it is highly visual, and there is no way of seeing that a particular
dream may be of this nature or of nurturing one.
As
an aside, this question of timing seems, from my experience at least, to be
important in such direct interactions as there may be between people’s minds.
Years ago there were many instances where the first few words that a close
relative was going to say came into my head. These always made up just a short
phrase and the time gap was always one or at most two seconds. This phenomenon
no longer occurs however. The tenuous connection with dreams was the relaxed
state of my mind at the time of occurrence. But I digress.
It
is as if, to extend Freud’s concept, such future-perceptive dreams include some
of tomorrow’s residues. If there is anything to this, and of course there may
not be, there are profound implications for the nature of time. But then, there
have to be profound differences from our day to day impressions of time. A
straight line, clockwork time simply cannot be. It is woven in with space and
space time is warped by matter and there cannot have been a straight line
infinity of time preceding the present.
I
have sometimes though that of the temporal triumvirate of the past, the present
and the future, the only one with a questionable reality is the present. This
may sound surprising but by way of explanation, if you imagine yourself sitting
in a room opposite someone, the sound of their voice comes out of the past as
does their visual image (at a different, much faster speed) since both take a time
to reach you. The processing of this information and your thoughts also takes
time so that ‘the present’ is a smeared combination of incoming information and
the brain’s work to render it comprehensible. This will apply to other sensory
inputs too. In terms of the reality of the future, we have previous experience
of reaching futures 100% of the time so, hopefully, we can expect this to
continue.
My
subjective experience suggests the possibility of tonight’s dreams including some
of tomorrow’s residues as well as today’s so that ‘dream time present’ would
also include elements of the very near future to be reached following the
exercise of albeit constrained free will. One can envisage a sort of asymmetric
bell-type curve of the probabilities of residue inclusion in dreams with the much
greater probabilities being from the preceding day.
One
other thing to look out for when interpreting a dream which appears to be
significant is that the true focus of the dream may not be on the central
character but one who is either less well defined or apparently in a lesser
role.
To
give one example, I had a dream when on holiday which caused me great concern
about the welfare of a colleague who was the central character in the dream. In
parts of the dream I was accompanied by a figure to my left and slightly behind
me as we rushed to find my friend. The concerns I had did not evaporate and on
my return to work I felt I must ask my colleague if she was alright. She said that
she was fine but asked if I had heard about Godfrey. It turned out that poor
Godfrey had committed suicide whilst I was away. It was then that I recognised
the figure beside me in the dream.
Returning
to Freud’s views on dreams, he placed great emphasis on the role of wish
fulfilment even when the ‘wish’ coming to light may appear to be a highly
negative or embarrassing one - and one which may be steadfastly denied by the
dreamer. This idea can be revealing and we should pay close attention to it in
the interpretation of dreams even though its presence is not always obvious and
the supposed ‘wish’ is not always palatable.
So
there is, after all, the potential to learn something from our dreams although
I would emphasize that in my opinion it is more a question of there being a
number of aspects of interest rather than dreams being of central importance
for fundamental and heretofore unrealised self-understanding.
No comments:
Post a Comment